Above is the original graph, taken from the Journal of Plant Physiology 1926. The rotation of the image was imperfectly done using paint hence the red box to at least have straight axes to base on.
These are the x-y variable values and their corresponding pixel coordinate values:
-from these it is calculated that the x-axis has 52.5 pixels per unit while the y-axis has 2.6 pixels per unit.
Below are tables for the pixel coordinates, values in pixels (coordinates minus origin coordinates), and the actual values (values in pixels divided by the calculated pixels per unit for each axis) of each X mark on the original graph.
From the values of the last table, the following graph was (re)constructed:
-i give myself a grade of 10 because even though the format of the y-axis values is different from the original graph; the overall appearance and upon closer inspection, the marked data points, are about precisely reconstructed.
These are the x-y variable values and their corresponding pixel coordinate values:
x | y | x(pixels) | y(pixels) | |
0 | 0 | 120 | 75 | |
2 | 25 | 225 | 140 | |
4 | 40 | 330 | 179 | |
6 | 80 | 435 | 283 | |
8 | 120 | 540 | 387 | |
10 | 645 |
-from these it is calculated that the x-axis has 52.5 pixels per unit while the y-axis has 2.6 pixels per unit.
Below are tables for the pixel coordinates, values in pixels (coordinates minus origin coordinates), and the actual values (values in pixels divided by the calculated pixels per unit for each axis) of each X mark on the original graph.
coordinates | : | values (in pixels): | ||
x | y | x | y | |
121 | 140 | 1 | 65 | |
136 | 135 | 16 | 60 | |
264 | 134 | 144 | 59 | |
308 | 138 | 188 | 63 | |
336 | 209 | 216 | 134 | |
370 | 283 | 250 | 208 | |
440 | 365 | 320 | 290 | |
457 | 368 | 337 | 293 |
actual values: | |
CO2 evolved | staining time |
0.019048 | 25 |
0.304762 | 23.07692 |
2.742857 | 22.69231 |
3.580952 | 24.23077 |
4.114286 | 51.53846 |
4.761905 | 80 |
6.095238 | 111.5385 |
6.419048 | 112.6923 |
From the values of the last table, the following graph was (re)constructed:
-i give myself a grade of 10 because even though the format of the y-axis values is different from the original graph; the overall appearance and upon closer inspection, the marked data points, are about precisely reconstructed.
2 comments:
Hello Aileen,
Not bad. But I'll be more convinced if you succeed in overlaying the graph. Ask your classmates how to do it. Tip though, crop the scanned image such that its origin becomes the lower left corner of the resulting image. When you overlay their origins MUST coincide.
Sorry Angel,
Should be Angel, not Aileen.
Post a Comment